Skip to content
All comparisons

Trauma therapies

EMDR vs Somatic Experiencing vs Brainspotting

All three work with the nervous system more than the story. All three can be effective. Fit, and the training of the person guiding you, matter more than the label.

EMDR Therapy

Structured protocol using bilateral stimulation (eyes, taps, sounds) while revisiting a memory.

Well-established evidence base

Best for

  • A specific single-incident event you can name (accident, assault, medical event)
  • People who want a clear protocol and defined phases
  • Adults with reasonable emotional regulation who can tolerate short revisits of the memory

Not ideal for

  • Active dissociation or unstable complex trauma without preparation phases
  • People who feel worse when asked to revisit memories directly

Practitioner to look for

Licensed mental health clinician (LCSW, LMHC, LMFT, PsyD, MD) with EMDRIA-approved training. Ask for EMDRIA membership or Certified status.

Cautions

  • Should not be your first-line approach during acute crisis or active psychosis.
  • If you dissociate easily, ask about the resourcing and stabilization phases before reprocessing.

Somatic Experiencing (SE)

Body-based approach that tracks sensation and works slowly through activation and release, often without narrating the event.

Evidence-informed

Best for

  • Complex, developmental, or diffuse trauma with no single 'event'
  • People who have felt worse after talk-based work
  • Those who prefer not to describe details of what happened

Not ideal for

  • People who want a fast, structured, symptom-focused protocol
  • Situations that need concurrent medical or psychiatric care and SE is the only support

Practitioner to look for

SE Practitioner (SEP) through SE International. SEP alone is a certification, not a mental-health license. For trauma, ideally choose an SEP who is also a licensed clinician (LCSW, LMHC, LMFT, PsyD, MD).

Cautions

  • Progress is slower and less measurable than EMDR. This is a feature, not a bug, for many people, but ask about expected pace.
  • If the practitioner is a coach only, it is not therapy. Combine with a licensed clinician for trauma.

Brainspotting

Uses fixed eye positions ('brainspots') to access material stored in the body and brain in a spacious, less structured way.

Emerging evidence

Best for

  • People who found EMDR too structured or activating
  • Somewhere between EMDR and SE in pace and structure
  • Adults who want to work with strong emotion without a lot of talking

Not ideal for

  • Active psychosis, severe dissociation, or acute suicidal crisis
  • People who need concrete homework and measurable weekly targets

Practitioner to look for

Brainspotting-trained practitioner, usually a licensed clinician. Ask which phase training they have completed (Phase 1, 2, 3, Master).

Cautions

  • Research base is smaller than EMDR. Effectiveness data is growing but limited.
  • Sessions can surface intense material with little warning. Ask how they support you between sessions.

How to choose

  • You have a specific incident you can name → start with EMDR through a licensed EMDRIA-trained clinician.
  • Your trauma is early, diffuse, or you've felt worse after talking about it → start with Somatic Experiencing, ideally with an SEP who is also a licensed clinician.
  • You liked the idea of EMDR but found it too structured → try Brainspotting.
  • You are in acute crisis, actively psychotic, or unable to stay present → stabilize first with a licensed clinician or crisis team before any of these.

Shared cautions across all options

  • None of these three is a substitute for medication or medical care when those are needed.
  • Ask any practitioner: 'What happens if I get destabilized between sessions? How do I reach you?' A vague answer is a red flag.

In a crisis right now? Open crisis resources.

More comparisons

These comparisons are educational only. They are not medical or mental-health advice, and they are not a substitute for care from a licensed professional.